‘Tis that time of the year again

Not Christmas, but something close to it: Budget time!

Decision makers turn to O!O first for what’s really happening in Eden
… You’re reading, aren’t you!?
Advertise on O!O – click here for details

Click to follow @DrewanBaird on twitter

O!O Correspondent. Bitou. 27 May 2013. 20h00. Budget time.

And next year, as you all know by now, is an election year and happiness must be spread to the masses.

Say what you like about SA, we have some very good legislation especially when it comes to the management of public finances. Legislation such as the MFMA which requires that our municipalities publish their draft budgets for all to see and to comment on and that the necessary adjustments be made in light of the comments received.

The MFMA requires that every year the mayor must present a draft budget to council by end March, for adoption by council by the end of the merry month of May. That is in just 5 days; by close of business this Friday.

In order to solicit the necessary comments the availability of the draft budget or “2013/2014 Top Level service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan” for Bitou Municipality was advertised as being “available for perusal” on Thursday, 23 May, allowing residents a full 7 days within which to study it and then submit their inputs and representations.

In his budget speech last year, Bitou’s Executive Mayor, Memory Booysen, explained as follows:

“As this budget constitutes the proposed financial plan for the next 3 years, it impacts on the community as a whole and it is thus extremely important to consult the community with a view to accept joint ownership and joint responsibility for the welfare of the municipality’s financial affairs. Consequently, a compulsory period of community liaison shall follow before the final approval of this budget on 31 May 2012. Inputs and representations shall be considered and the budget revised accordingly.”

The budget comprises nearly 400 pages of facts, figures, tables, graphs, policies, explanations, notes and opaque jargon. Just a cursory glance shows that the stated intention of allowing for public participation is not a sincere one. It is an impossibility to do what must be done in the time allowed.

One cannot help but wonder why, when the Mayor so obviously knows the law and the importance of the legally prescribed process, he makes it impossible.

All one can do at this stage is to just pick up here and there on some of the areas and issues that stand out as questionable and speculate.

Approximately 35% of the municipality’s operational budget is spent on personnel, so it is always a good place to look quickly at a major chunk of the budget.

PERSONNEL.

Total personnel:
2011/12 – 560
2012/13 – 481
2013/14 – 733
(A 52% increase)

Contract employees:
2011/2012 – 41
2012/2013 – 47
2013/2014 – 217
(A 362% increase)

Many more contract employees are going to be employed this financial year. Why?

Well, it is an election year and the politicians promised jobs last time and must now deliver on that promise. When you are unemployed and destitute, a temporary job with the municipality organised for you by your councillor is of course a great motivator to support his/her party and to work to promote the party. Viva, DA, viva.

These are nothing but “political” positions not unlike the three contract positions in the Deputy Mayor’s office; created for no reason other than political expediency and paid for by the taxpayers.

This is the explanation offered:

“In order to ensure economic viability and to not overstretch the already limited financial resources, and cash management strategy vacancies have been significantly rationalized downwards.”

What does that mean?
What is a “cash management strategy vacancy”?
How do you “significantly rationalize” a “vacancy” “downwards”?

Perhaps, it means that to increase revenue, better care will be taken of the money and in order to do so all vacancies in the finance department have been filled?

“Only positions critical for service delivery have been budgeted for the 2013/2014 financial year.”

And then ominously:

“The cost to fill the newly approved organizational structure was determined and is at this stage unaffordable in the current financial context.”

So what does that mean?

Significantly higher rates increases in our future?  And last year the Mayor told us, in no less than five mayoral letters that the organisational restructuring would deliver significant savings in future.

But what does this all amount to in rands and cents?

The total personnel costs (p 72 of the Draft Budget) are as follows:

2007/08…R50m
2010/11…R90m (80% increase)
2011/12…R115.4m
2012/13…R116.1m
2013/14…R131.1m
(increase of 13% yoy and 262% over 5 years)

What proportion of that do the bosses get?

2011/12…R6,285,000
2012/13…R8,169,000
2013/14…R8,490,000

And how is that made up?

Municipal Manager:
R1,599,504

Chief financial Officer:
R1,441,390

HOD Community services:
R1,362,332

HOD Corporate Services:
R1,362,333

HOD Planning & Economic Development:
R1,362,332

HOD Infrastructure Services:
R1,362,333

Cast your mind back to 2011, around election time, and you will remember that our politicians made a big noise and many promises about how the high salaries of HOD’s, etc. would be reduced to more realistic and affordable levels.

It was their resolve that HOD’s would earn no more than R880k per annum and the MM an additional 15% or R1,012,000.

There was even an occasion when the Mayor turned down a very competent MM who was willing to take a salary of R1m per annum, claiming that the maximum affordable salary Bitou could pay its municipal manager was R880,000 and not a cent more.

And now the budget for HOD’s is 55% greater for salaries, and an MM is slotted at 58% above what council resolved and 82% more than what the mayor himself said was the affordable level.

We, the citizens of Bitou municipality are, to quote our mayor, “to accept joint ownership and joint responsibility for the welfare of the municipality’s financial affairs” through a budget that looks like this? And we haven’t even scratched the surface yet.

I wonder how many of the good citizens of Plett and the other towns in SA were aware of their right and duty to take part in the budgeting process?

I wonder how many other towns made it impossible for their citizens to do so?

I wonder how Bitou’s budget, and service charges in particular, compare to other municipalities?

I wonder, is this budget zero based or is it just a percentage game?

I wonder how many times you’ve been had
And I wonder how many plans have gone bad
I wonder and worry my friend
I wonder I wonder, wonder don’t you?

[Rodrigues. I wonder.]

________________________________________________________
DREWAN BAIRD COMMUNICATIONSensaytional – 076 349 6316
Making sure they see it your way
________________________________________________________

Click here to receive updates | Advertise on O!O | Home

6 thoughts on “‘Tis that time of the year again

  1. Sceptic. Ek wil met jou stry, my hart se my ek moet, maar ek kannie.

  2. Die enigste fout wat jy maak Willempie is om te dink dat die manne (en dame wie jy so opnoem) Plett regeer. Plett word regeer deur die DA in die Kaap. Die ouens in Plett is puppets. Niks meer nie. Om die waarheid te sê, jou klagte oor hul bevoegdheid en akademiese opvoeding is juis presies dit waarna die DA soek in hul plaaslike regering kandidate, want behoede jou as jy vir jouself kan dink. Vra maar vir meneer Brummer. Hy sal jou mooi vertel wat gebeur met ‘n DA man wat vir homself kan dink…

  3. Willempie en IP niks gaan gebeur ou maters niks gaan gebeur nie. Die Daceivers is gemaklik in die saal en die kiesers wat die Daceivers raadslede verkies het sal hulle weer verkies en sal nie teen hulle in opstand kom nie. Dit is nou maar die stand van sake in RSA. Ons sukkel nou al vir drie jaar met die klomp ANC,DA en Cope ek wil nie eens praat van die NPP en die veroordeelde verkragter se raadslede in Oudtshoorn, Eden en Kannaland nie. Ek hoop maar julle planne gaan werk met ‘n rates boycott. Die feit van die saak is dat al die mense het in Eden het nie toegang tot OO en Jeff nie en die hoofstroom media stel nie belang om die DAceivers aan te vat nie.

  4. Dis ‘n kwessie dat die DA se onderok van onbevoegdheid uitsteek.

    Kyk na die DA se spannetjie, ‘n Uitvoerende Burgemeester wat sy ondervinding onder die ANC opgedoen het, ‘n Burgkom lid met ‘n standerd ses wat vir sewe jaar op die raad sit en steeds nie ‘n koeking clue het wat aangaan nie en voor dit ‘n huisbediende was, ‘n tweede Burgkom lid ook met ‘n standerd ses en tot twee jaar gelede ‘n painter was en sy politiek in die ID geleer het. En dan natuurlik COPE se man, ‘n DJ sonder ‘n clue. Wie weet watter standerd hy uit die skool is.

    Dit is die manne en vrou wat Plett regeer. Die room van die DA in Plett. Hulle gekose bestuursspan vir Plett.

    Dis nie nodig om te wonder nie all wat gedoen kan word is om te worry!

  5. Hier kom n ding !!
    Rates boycott, only if the people of Eden have had enough !
    Gaan hul betyds wakkerskrik is die groot vraag ?
    Kan die publiek n dispuut met die munisipaliteit verklaar as belastingverhogings en dienslewering nie ooreenstem of bekostigbaar raak nie ? JAAAAA !
    Sien onlangse Konstitusionele hofbeslissing, reel 43/44 van die welbesproke |Rademan saak.
    Hier kom n ding Memory, hier kom n groot ding en die mense gaat jou kom opsoek meneertjie, kry jou huis in orde knapie !!

  6. WOW. Not only does this allow citizens a full 7 days to study the budget and give their input, but in the same 7 days Council will consider the input by the citizens amend the budget accordingly. After off course properly applying their minds to all of this and holding meeting to discuss it.

    Just a thought though. How many councillors have actually read the budget and knows what they are voting on?

    And how telling is this little gem:

    “The cost to fill the newly approved organizational structure was determined and is at this stage unaffordable in the current financial context.”

    How could council have approved an organizational structure that they could not afford? Or was the structure just a ruse to funnel some money to some or other company to draft the structure that supported the current reigning party in the election campaigns?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s