“OO vilifies the DA”, says James Selfe
News with intent!
Your advertising is only as good as the people who see it – repeatedly! You want to do business with OO readers – people with money and control of corporate budgets. Click here
Oudtshoorn. 10 September 2012. 13h50. The exacting; the fastidious; the exigent DA – they of infallible accounting and recording; they of inerrant procedure…
They filed their answering affidavit in the High Court matter Johann Brummer v. DA (17305/2012) late.
The DA. It demands one thing and does another – counsel for the DA submitted the answering affidavit 20 minutes late, with the proviso that “the deponent, Mr. James Selfe, was called out before a final read through could be completed. If any changes are made before he signs, I will draw your attention to these.”
OO will publish an analysis of the DA’s argument later today, having briefly scanned it upon receipt.
Selfe does mention OO though: “There have also been a number of articles in an online publication called Oudtshoorn Online vilifying the Party…”
No, dear sir, OO simply reported what the DA did. If there is “vilification”, it must mean that the DA was vile.